SEC Rule 17a-4 and WORM storage, explained
13 min read

What WORM means
WORM stands for write once, read many. The SEC uses the term itself: when it amended the rule in 2022 it described the old requirement as keeping electronic records “exclusively in a non-rewriteable, non-erasable format (also known as a write once, read many (‘WORM’) format).” A record written to WORM storage can be read as often as anyone likes, but nobody can change it or erase it before its retention period ends. That includes the firm's own administrators.
Before the amendments, WORM was the only format the rule allowed for records a broker-dealer kept on electronic storage. That is why “WORM” and “17a-4 compliant” came to be used as if they meant the same thing. Since 2023 they do not. The rule now accepts a second method, a complete time-stamped audit trail, and WORM is one of two ways to meet it.
Quick reference
- Who the WORM rule bindsBroker-dealers17 CFR 240.17a-4(f)
- Storage modes the rule allows217 CFR 240.17a-4(f)(2)(i)(A), (B)
- Amendments took effectJan. 3, 202387 FR 66412
- Compliance date for the 17a-4 changesMay 3, 202387 FR 66412
- Who signs the firm's undertakingDEO or D3P17 CFR 240.17a-4(f)(3)(v)(A)
- Blotters, ledgers and other 17a-4(a) records6 years17 CFR 240.17a-4(a)
- Communications and other 17a-4(b) records3 years17 CFR 240.17a-4(b)
- WORM or audit trail for SEC-registered advisersNot in 204-2(g)17 CFR 275.204-2(g)
DEO = designated executive officer; D3P = designated third party. Figures as the rule and the 2022 release state them.
Who Rule 17a-4(f) binds
Rule 17a-4 is an Exchange Act rule for broker-dealers. Paragraph (f) lets a broker-dealer keep the records that Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4 require on an electronic recordkeeping system, which the rule defines as one that “preserves records in a digital format in a manner that permits the records to be viewed and downloaded”. FINRA sends its members to the same standard: Rule 4511(c) says FINRA books and records “shall be preserved in a format and media that complies with SEA Rule 17a-4.” Our guide to FINRA Rule 4511 covers the rest of that rule.
An SEC-registered investment adviser is a different case. Its electronic records fall under Advisers Act Rule 204-2(g), which has no WORM requirement, no audit-trail requirement and no undertaking. Those conditions belong to 17a-4(f) alone. A firm registered both ways keeps its broker-dealer records to 17a-4(f).
Which storage rule applies to which firm
| Firm | Storage rule | WORM or audit trail required? |
|---|---|---|
| Broker-dealer (FINRA member) | 17a-4(f); FINRA 4511(c) | Yes: one of the two modes |
| SEC-registered investment adviser | 204-2(g) | No. The rule names neither |
| Dual registrant | 17a-4(f); 204-2(h)(1) | Yes for its broker-dealer records |
17 CFR 240.17a-4(f); FINRA Rule 4511(c); 17 CFR 275.204-2(g), (h)(1)
For the dual registrant, Rule 204-2(h)(1) says a record kept under 17a-3 or 17a-4 that “is substantially the same as the book or other record required to be made, kept, maintained and preserved under this section, shall be deemed to be made, kept, maintained and preserved in compliance with this section.” Which records meet that test is a question for your compliance counsel.
What the 2022 amendments changed
The SEC adopted the amendments in a release published on November 3, 2022. They took effect on January 3, 2023, and “The compliance date for the amendments to 17 CFR 240.17a-4 is May 3, 2023.”
- Nov. 3, 2022Published in the Federal Register at 87 FR 66412
- Jan. 3, 2023Effective date
- May 3, 2023Compliance date for the amendments to Rule 17a-4
Markers sit at their real distance apart. The well band is the four months firms had between the effective date and the compliance date.
The headline change is the audit-trail alternative, but it was not the only one. The release also dropped two filings a firm used to make before it could store anything electronically, and changed who gives the undertaking.
Rule 17a-4(f) before and after the 2022 amendments
| Provision | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| Storage format | Exclusively non-rewriteable, non-erasable: the WORM format | WORM, or a complete time-stamped audit trail that lets the original be re-created |
| Notice before using electronic storage | Notify the examining authority first, with a 90-day notice for media other than optical disk | Eliminated |
| Representation that the medium meets the rule | From the broker-dealer, the storage vendor or another third party with expertise | Eliminated |
| Who gives the undertaking to the examining authority | At least one third party with access to the records | A designated executive officer or a designated third party |
| What the system is | Preserves records in a digital format and requires a computer to access them | Preserves records in a digital format that permits them to be viewed and downloaded |
87 FR 66412 (Nov. 3, 2022), sections I.B, II.B, II.C and II.E.6; 17 CFR 240.17a-4(f)
The release adds that the amended rule requires firms “to be able to produce a record in a human readable and reasonably usable electronic format.” The full text is on the Federal Register.
WORM or audit trail: the two modes side by side
The amended rule gives a broker-dealer a choice for each electronic recordkeeping system. It can keep records where they cannot be changed at all, or keep them where they can be changed, provided every change leaves a trail from which the original can be rebuilt. Either one satisfies paragraph (f)(2)(i), and the rule does not rank them. Because the test is put to each electronic recordkeeping system, by our reading a firm may meet it one way in one system and the other way in another.
The audit-trail mode
17a-4(f)(2)(i)(A)
- A complete time-stamped audit trail, kept for the record's whole retention period(A)
- All modifications to and deletions of the record or any part of it(A)(1)
- The date and time of actions that create, modify, or delete the record(A)(2)
- If applicable, who created, modified, or deleted it(A)(3)
- Anything else needed to keep the record authentic and reliable and to re-create the original(A)(4)
The WORM mode
17a-4(f)(2)(i)(B)
- The records kept exclusively in a non-rewriteable, non-erasable format(B)
- An audit system giving accountability for inputting records and any changes to each original and duplicate(f)(3)(iii)
- The audit results available for examination by the SEC and the firm's SRO(f)(3)(iii)(A)
- The audit results kept as long as the records they audit(f)(3)(iii)(B)
The same questions, asked of each mode
| Question | WORM mode | Audit-trail mode |
|---|---|---|
| Can a stored record be changed? | No: non-rewriteable, non-erasable | It can, but every change and deletion is logged |
| Can the original be recovered? | It is never altered | The trail must permit re-creation of the original |
| Duty for this mode only | An audit system over inputting and changes | The trail itself |
| What an export carries | The record | The record and its audit trail |
| Where it usually lives, by our reading | A storage layer with a locked retention period | The application: an archive or records system |
17 CFR 240.17a-4(f)(2)(i)(A)-(B), (f)(2)(iv), (f)(3)(iii)
The WORM mode puts the control in the storage. A locked retention period refuses any change, so the proof is the lock itself, but the rule then asks for a separate audit system that accounts for the inputting of records and of any changes made to them. The audit-trail mode puts the control in the software. It suits a system that has to allow edits, such as a document store or a CRM that keeps records, as long as nothing is lost when someone edits. By our reading that is why storage products are sold for the first mode and archives and records systems for the second. The storage side is read provider by provider in the best SEC 17a-4 compliant cloud storage.
What every system must do, in either mode
The mode is one line of paragraph (f)(2). The rest of (f)(2) and all of (f)(3) apply whichever mode the firm picks, and most of it is about getting records back out. The system must “Verify automatically the completeness and accuracy of the processes for storing and retaining records electronically”, keep a backup or “other redundancy capabilities”, and be able to “readily download and transfer copies of a record and its audit trail (if applicable) in both a human readable format and in a reasonably usable electronic format”, together with “the information needed to locate the electronic record”.
The firm itself must have facilities “for immediately producing the records”, be ready to “immediately provide” any record a regulator asks for, and keep current “all information necessary to access and locate records”. Rule 17a-4(j) adds the general duty to furnish copies promptly to the Commission. The finder below lists every duty for your firm type and mode, with its paragraph.
Which storage duties apply to your records
Pick your firm and storage mode. Set to a broker-dealer on WORM.
Rule 17a-4(f), Non-rewriteable, non-erasable (WORM) mode
- Keep the records “exclusively in a non-rewriteable, non-erasable format”17a-4(f)(2)(i)(B)
- Run an audit system “providing for accountability regarding inputting of records” and of any changes to every original and duplicate17a-4(f)(3)(iii)
- Keep the audit system's results available for examination, and preserve them for the time required for the audited records17a-4(f)(3)(iii)(A)-(B)
Rules 17a-4(f) and 17a-4(i), in either mode
- Verify automatically that storing and retaining records electronically is complete and accurate17a-4(f)(2)(ii)
- If applicable, serialize the original and duplicate storage units and time-date each retention period17a-4(f)(2)(iii)
- Download and transfer a record, its audit trail if any, and the information to locate it, in a human readable and a reasonably usable electronic format17a-4(f)(2)(iv)
- Keep a backup electronic recordkeeping system, or other redundancy that ensures access to the records17a-4(f)(2)(v)
- Have facilities for immediately producing the records, and copies, for examiners17a-4(f)(3)(i)
- Be ready to provide, and immediately provide, any stored record a regulator requests17a-4(f)(3)(ii)
- Keep current, and provide promptly on request, all information needed to access and locate the records17a-4(f)(3)(iv)
- Keep an undertaking on file with the designated examining authority, signed by a designated executive officer or a designated third party17a-4(f)(3)(v)(A)
- If an outside service owns and operates the servers, it files its own written undertaking with the Commission (or the shorter alternative)17a-4(i)(1)
For an archive, the export line is the one worth testing before you sign. Archives built for message capture are compared in email archiving software and text message archiving.
The undertaking: who signs and what they promise
Every broker-dealer that keeps records electronically must “Have at all times filed with the designated examining authority” an undertaking about those records, “signed by either a designated executive officer or designated third party”. The rule writes out the words of the undertaking itself. Its opening promise:
In plain terms, the signer is the fallback. If the firm cannot or will not produce a record, the signer commits to getting it out of the system in a form an examiner can read and work with. The same promise runs to the firm's SROs and to any state securities regulator with jurisdiction over it.
Designated executive officer or designated third party
| Point | Designated executive officer | Designated third party |
|---|---|---|
| Who it is | “a member of senior management” of the broker-dealer | “a person that is not affiliated with” the broker-dealer |
| What they need | Access to the records on the system, and the ability to provide them | The same access and ability to provide the records |
| Help they may appoint | In writing, up to two designated officers and up to three designated specialists | The rule names no appointees |
| Who stays bound | The executive officer, even after appointing others | The third party that signs |
17 CFR 240.17a-4(f)(1)(iii), (f)(1)(vi), (f)(3)(v)(B)-(C)
The adopting release explains the choice: “some firms may choose the Designated Executive Officer option for cyber-security reasons because these firms prefer to make this an internal function. Other firms may elect the Designated Third-Party Option because they prefer to outsource this function.” In a firm of a few people the executive officer is often the owner, so the appointment of up to two designated officers is what keeps the promise good when that person is unable to act.
How long the records stay locked
Rule 17a-4(f) sets how records are kept, not for how long. The periods come from the rest of Rule 17a-4 and, for FINRA records that have no period of their own, from FINRA Rule 4511(b). A WORM store has to carry each period on each class of record, so the periods decide how the store is set up.
Periods a broker-dealer's store has to carry
| Records | Kept for | Rule |
|---|---|---|
| Blotters, ledgers, the securities record | 6 years, first 2 easily accessible | 17a-4(a) |
| Communications sent and received, confirmations, order memoranda | 3 years, first 2 easily accessible | 17a-4(b), (b)(4) |
| Account opening and terms records | 6 years after the account closes | 17a-4(c) |
| Compliance, supervisory and procedures manuals | 3 years after the manual stops being used | 17a-4(e)(7) |
| Articles, minute books, Forms BD | Life of the enterprise and any successor | 17a-4(d) |
| FINRA books and records with no period of their own | At least 6 years | FINRA 4511(b) |
| Results of the WORM-mode audit system | As long as the audited records | 17a-4(f)(3)(iii)(B) |
17 CFR 240.17a-4(a)-(e), (f)(3)(iii)(B); FINRA Rule 4511(b)
Two points trip firms up. First, 17a-4(a) and (b) give a length and a two-year easily accessible window but do not say what event the period runs from, so agree the start point with your compliance counsel before you set a lock. A lock that runs out before the rule's period does leaves the record erasable while the rule still requires it. Second, records kept “during the life of the enterprise and of any successor enterprise” have no end date for a lock to count down to. Our books and records retention calculator works out the keep-until date for each class.
Putting 17a-4(f) in place at a small broker-dealer

A firm with a handful of registered people usually has three or four systems that hold required records, and no one whose whole job is records. These nine steps cover the rule in the order a small firm meets it. The books and records checklist gives the list for step one, and the archiving requirements matcher maps each channel your people use for step two.
Nine steps, in order
- 01List every class of record the firm keeps and the period each one carries.17a-4(a)-(e)
- 02Map where each class lives: the email archive, the text archive, the trading system, the document store.17a-3; 17a-4(b)(4)
- 03Pick the mode for each system, WORM or audit trail, and note the choice in your procedures.17a-4(f)(2)(i)
- 04Pull one record, with its trail if it has one, in a human readable and a reasonably usable electronic format.17a-4(f)(2)(iv)
- 05Confirm the backup system or other redundancy, and where the second copy sits.17a-4(f)(2)(v)
- 06Name the signer, executive officer or third party, and file the undertaking with your examining authority.17a-4(f)(3)(v)(A)
- 07Check that each outside service holding your records has filed its own undertaking with the Commission.17a-4(i)(1)
- 08Keep the information needed to access and locate the records current, ready to hand over on request.17a-4(f)(3)(iv)
- 09On WORM systems, run the audit system over inputting and changes and keep its results as long as the records.17a-4(f)(3)(iii)
Steps four and six are the two a firm can check this week: can it hand over a record, and is someone on file who will if the firm cannot. Off-channel messages never reach any of these systems, which is why they are a records failure before they are anything else; see off-channel communications.
What to ask a storage or archive vendor
The duties in Rule 17a-4(f) fall on the broker-dealer. A vendor can make them easy to meet, but no vendor can meet them for you, and neither the SEC nor FINRA approves storage or archive products. FINRA also retired its Compliance Vendor Directory, effective March 19, 2024, so a listing there is no longer a check you can run. Ask each vendor for the documents instead.
Ten questions for a storage or archive vendor
- 01Which mode does the system meet: non-rewriteable and non-erasable, or a complete time-stamped audit trail? Where does your documentation say so?17a-4(f)(2)(i)
- 02Once a retention period is set, can anyone at our firm or at yours shorten or remove it?17a-4(f)(2)(i)(B)
- 03How does the system verify automatically that storing and retaining each record is complete and accurate?17a-4(f)(2)(ii)
- 04How is each record's retention period dated, and can we set a different period for each record class?17a-4(f)(2)(iii)
- 05Can you export a sample record and its audit trail in a human readable format and a reasonably usable electronic format? Which formats?17a-4(f)(2)(iv)
- 06What is the backup system or other redundancy, and where is the second copy held?17a-4(f)(2)(v)
- 07Have you filed a written undertaking with the Commission, and is it the traditional or the alternative form?17a-4(i)(1)
- 08Will you act as our designated third party for the undertaking, or should we name an executive officer?17a-4(f)(3)(v)(A)
- 09Has an independent firm assessed the system against Rule 17a-4(f), and may we read the full report?17a-4(f)
- 10If we leave, how do we get every record and its audit trail out, and in what format?17a-4(f)(2)(iv)
An independent assessment is the vendor's evidence for part of the rule, not a regulator's approval. Read which mode it covers and what configuration it assumes. How six storage products answer these questions on their own pages is in our 17a-4 storage comparison.
Advisers: Rule 204-2(g) asks something else
Advisers often meet WORM in vendor material written for broker-dealers. An SEC-registered adviser keeps electronic records under Rule 204-2(g), on “any digital storage medium or system that meets the terms of this section.” Those terms overlap with 17a-4(f) in purpose but not in form.
Rule 17a-4(f) and Rule 204-2(g), line by line
| Point | Broker-dealer, 17a-4(f) | Adviser, 204-2(g) |
|---|---|---|
| Storage format | WORM or a complete time-stamped audit trail | Any digital storage medium or system that meets the rule's terms |
| Finding records | Keep current the information to access and locate them | Arrange and index them for easy location, access and retrieval |
| Producing records | Download in a human readable and a reasonably usable electronic format | A legible, true and complete copy, a printout, and means to view and print |
| Second copy | A backup system or other redundancy | A duplicate copy, stored separately, for the full period |
| Protection | The lock or the trail; in WORM mode an audit system too | Safeguard from loss, alteration, or destruction; limit access |
| Undertaking | On file with the examining authority, signed by a designated executive officer or third party | None |
17 CFR 240.17a-4(f)(2)-(3); 17 CFR 275.204-2(g)(1)-(3)
That safeguarding line is the closest 204-2(g) comes to WORM, and it asks for procedures, not a format. An adviser may choose a locked store as one way to show records are safe from alteration, but the rule does not require it. The adviser's full list of records and periods is in Rule 204-2, the adviser books and records rule.
Questions firms ask about WORM
Is WORM storage still required under Rule 17a-4?
Not as the only option. Since the 2022 amendments, which had a compliance date of May 3, 2023, a broker-dealer's electronic recordkeeping system may either keep records in a non-rewriteable, non-erasable format or keep a complete time-stamped audit trail that permits re-creation of the original. WORM systems already in use can stay.
17 CFR 240.17a-4(f)(2)(i)(A)-(B); 87 FR 66412
Does an RIA need WORM storage?
No. Rule 204-2(g) lets an SEC-registered adviser keep records on any digital storage that meets its terms: indexed for retrieval, produced promptly, duplicated, and safeguarded “from loss, alteration, or destruction”. WORM and the audit trail are 17a-4(f) conditions. A dual registrant keeps its broker-dealer records to 17a-4(f).
17 CFR 275.204-2(g)(1)-(3)
Do we still notify our examining authority before storing records electronically?
No. The old rule required notice before a firm employed electronic storage media, with a 90-day notice for media other than optical disk, and a representation that the medium met the rule. The 2022 amendments eliminated both. The undertaking is still required.
87 FR 66412, section II.C; 17 CFR 240.17a-4(f)(3)(v)(A)
Can our archive vendor be our designated third party?
The rule asks that a designated third party be “a person that is not affiliated with” the firm who has access to, and the ability to provide, the records on the system. Whether a given vendor will sign the undertaking is a question to put to that vendor, in writing.
17 CFR 240.17a-4(f)(1)(vi)
Is cloud storage allowed?
The rule speaks of an “electronic recordkeeping system” and names no technology. When an outside service owns and operates the servers, it files its own undertaking with the Commission that the records belong to the firm and will be surrendered promptly on request, or the shorter alternative where the firm has independent access.
17 CFR 240.17a-4(f), (i)(1)
Is any storage product SEC certified or FINRA approved?
No. Neither regulator approves storage or archive products, and the 17a-4(f) duties stay with the broker-dealer. FINRA Rule 4511(c) asks that FINRA records be kept “in a format and media that complies with SEA Rule 17a-4”. The full rule is on eCFR; how vendors describe themselves is read in our storage comparison.
17 CFR 240.17a-4(f); FINRA Rule 4511(c)
This guide explains the rule; it is not legal advice. Check your firm's set-up against the full rule text with your compliance counsel.